Laws and attitudes

by Evan on April 10, 2013

I am interested in the interplay between generational attitudes and institutionalized law.

I think this relationship closely resembles the parent-child relationship, wherein the thoughts of the former are by the latter internalized, rebelled against and interpreted in new ways. Each generation finds meaningful new ways to interpret the values of the previous generation.

As generations of new voters replace generations of older voters, attitudes are shifting on contentious issues like gay marriage, immigration, marijuana and gun control.

We are in the interpretation part of the above cycle. The standard model of thinking on these issues held sway for years. In time, opposition to these institutionalized attitudes became aggravated. Now a change is taking place.

I wonder how the values and principles behind these laws will be reinterpreted by the new generation. The key is determining what value was institutionalized by the policy in question.

For example, what was the principle behind banning gay marriage? If it promoted the value of ‘healthy families’, then how will the new generation institutionalize the value of ‘healthy families’?

If the value behind criminalizing marijuana was temperance, how will this generation’s vision of temperance manifest itself in law?

Only time can help us see which values are at the core of these laws, how those values will be interpreted and the new ways they become institutionalized. But I’m excited to see it happen.

{ 0 comments }

Gov. Chris Christie, President Obama and Hurricane Sandy

October 30, 2012

Source There are lots of stories about New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie praising President Obama and his administration for their response to Hurricane Sandy. At first I was surprised to see a public figure profusely praise someone in the opposite party, especially so near an election. However, the more I thought about the situation the [...]

Read the full article →

Campaign Speechwriting Advice from the Late Ted Sorensen

October 25, 2012

Source As we enter the final phase of the presidential campaign, there is little more for the candidates to do than advertise, spin and stump. Today I want to look at the last of those three: stump speeches. I have been reading Ted Sorensen’s autobiography, which has a chapter devoted to speechwriting. As I read [...]

Read the full article →